For European growth funds · 12 to 35 portcos
The hiring
infrastructure
for your portfolio.
Plug your portfolio into Europe's first multi-fund hiring network. Cut cost-per-hire by 3x. Run a fund-private dashboard while your portcos benefit from a 100x larger talent pool.
GDPR-native · Sovereign EU hosting · ISO 27001 (Q3 2026)
Status
Closed alpha
Q2 2026 · invitation only
Not portco-level sourcing. A fund-level hiring infrastructure. Built for Partners and CFOs, not for portco recruiters.
What our partners observe
−40%
cost-per-hire
100x
talent pool
48h
time-to-interview
+0.6%
carry recovered
State of play
Today, your talent process looks like this.
The most under-measured operational lever in modern venture. Recognise yourself?
-
01
A #talent-network Slack with 47 members and 3 messages per week.
-
02
An 'Open Roles' Google Sheet updated once per quarter.
-
03
An email every 3 months: 'we have a great rejected VP Sales, who needs one?'
-
04
Zero portfolio-aggregated cost-per-hire numbers in any of your board packs.
-
05
Capped at 3-4 cross-portco placements per year — while your portcos sign 80 to 150 hires.
→ It works. It plateaus. And the carry leakage shows up in no LP report.
The problem
Your portcos are burning capital on hiring.
Four structural frictions every investment committee recognises — without a tool to fix them.
01
Internal competition
Your portcos hire the same profiles, on the same channels, at the same price. The fund pays three times for the same curation.
02
Lost finalists
One portco rejects a qualified finalist. Another is searching for that exact profile. No one knows. The talent vanishes.
03
No aggregated view
Every board pack contains a 'hiring' slide. None are comparable. Partners navigate blind.
04
Carry leakage
0.4 to 0.8% of carry lost every cycle to an operational problem nobody measures, nobody reports in LP letters.
The solution
One platform. Four steps.
From fund onboarding to consolidated KPIs — without touching the portcos' internal processes.
01
Fund onboarding
30 minutes with our team. You define the sharing policy and invite your portfolio companies.
02
Portco activation
Each portco activates its workspace in 10 min. No ATS to replace, native integrations with Greenhouse / Ashby / Lever.
03
Talent pooling
Rejected finalists circulate automatically between portcos based on your sharing rules, anonymised by default.
04
Consolidated KPIs
Fund dashboard: portfolio cost-per-hire, time-to-fill, pooled talent, carry leakage in basis points.
Sharing policy
Three levels. You stay in control.
From inner circle to open ecosystem — every fund sets its own cadence and guardrails.
Level 1
Your portcos
Level 1
Your portcos
Finalists flow immediately between portcos within the same fund. Maximum confidentiality.
Level 2
Partner funds
Activated after a configurable delay, towards friendly funds you co-invest with.
Level 3
Extended network
Progressive opening to non-competing companies. Manually activated, never by default.
→ Sequential activation. You stay in control at every step.
Multi-fund reality
Your portcos have multiple funds in their cap table.
A typical Series B portco has 3 to 7 institutional investors. Skalisto handles this natively.
Acme (portco) sits in Sequoia's, Index's and Atomico's portfolios. The 3 funds each pay a separate subscription. Acme appears in all 3 fund dashboards — each fund sees its own rollup.
Acme's rejected finalists flow into the global network, not a per-fund silo. The wider the network, the more efficient pooling becomes for everyone.
And between the 3 funds — each one stays blind to the other's portfolio. Which brings us to the next point.
Portco
Acme
Multi-fund confidentiality
Fund data stays fund. Always.
This is the first objection from any serious Partner. Here's exactly what each fund sees — and doesn't see.
Fund-private dashboards
Sequoia never sees Index's portfolio. No fund data leaves your perimeter — including for shared portcos. KPIs, hires, comp ranges: everything is fund-scoped.
Anonymisation by default
On the pooling network, finalists circulate without identity. The destination portco sees 'Senior Backend, ex-Stripe, 6yrs XP' — not 'Jean Dupont rejected by Acme'. Re-identification on mutual acceptance only.
Masked provenance
Destination portcos never know which source portco a finalist came from. No fund learns anything about another fund's hires or rejections through the platform. Bloomberg-style, not LinkedIn-style.
Differentiation
Not an ATS. Not a sourcing agent. A fund-level category.
Why a Partner buys Skalisto rather than another tool — and why portco ATS and agentic sourcing don't cover the fund-level need.
|
Dimension |
Status quo Slack + Google Sheet |
Portco ATS Greenhouse · Ashby · Lever |
Agentic sourcing Findem · Mercor · Eightfold |
Skalisto Fund infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buyer | — | Head of People (portco) | VP Talent (portco) | Partner / CFO (fund) |
| Metric | None | Portco time-to-fill | Portco time-to-interview | Portfolio cost-per-hire · carry leakage |
| Multi-fund | N/A | No | Partial | Native |
| What flows | Ad-hoc emails | Sister-companies only | AI-sourced candidates | Rejected finalists |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 portco-grade | SOC 2 | Fund-grade · DPA · ISO roadmap |
Who it's for (and who it isn't)
We know our customer. And our non-customer.
For you if
- Growth fund, late-stage VC, growth-PE, tech-tilted family office
- €200M to €2B AUM · 12 to 35 active portcos
- 0 to 2 fund-level HR people (no dedicated Talent team)
- Your portcos sign 60 to 200 hires/year and you have no aggregated number
Not for you if
- × Sequoia, a16z, Index Ventures, Atomico, Bessemer, General Catalyst
- × You already built a 10+ person Talent team in-house
- × You run an early-stage seed fund with under 8 portcos
- × Your thesis excludes operational coordination across portcos
→ We build the infrastructure for the 200+ funds that don't have the scale to internalise. If you're top-tier with an in-house Talent team, you're not our customer — you're our reference.
Trust & infrastructure
Built to pass an LP due diligence.
We sell to funds. Governance is aligned with what your Limited Partners expect — not what a portco-grade ATS ships with.
Hosting
Paris (Scaleway fr-par)
Compliance
GDPR-native · Standard DPA · Automated right to erasure
Security
TLS 1.3 · AES-256 at rest · Per-fund row-level isolation
Audit roadmap
ISO 27001 (Q3 2026) · SOC 2 Type I (Q4 2026)
Anonymisation
Default on cross-portco · Re-identification opt-in only
Fund data
Never used for cross-fund benchmarking · Never sold · Full export on request
Note from the founder
When I first sat down with a Partner from a European growth fund, he described the problem in two sentences: 22 portcos hiring the same profiles in parallel, with zero coordination. Senior Backend, VP Sales SaaS, Head of Finance. At every hire, three qualified rejected finalists vanish — while the portco next door is searching for that exact profile.
Measured across his portfolio, that waste runs €1.8M to €2.2M per year in recruiter fees paid double or triple. Across the fund's lifetime, 40 to 80 basis points of carry lost to an operational problem nobody measures, nobody reports in LP letters, nobody discusses in investment committee.
Sequoia, a16z, Index figured this out eight years ago and built in-house Talent teams. For the 200+ other European growth funds that don't have the scale to internalise, the state of the art stops at a #talent-network Slack channel and a quarterly Google Sheet.
Skalisto is building the missing infrastructure. Not another ATS. Not another sourcing agent. A platform whose only function is to turn a rejected finalist into a portfolio opportunity — with the governance and confidentiality standards a Partner of institutional capital expects.
If you run 12 to 35 portcos and 'cost-per-hire portfolio-aggregated' doesn't appear in any of your board packs, we should probably talk.
— Alexia Bachelier, Founder
Read the full thesis →Alpha cohort · 2026
8 funds. Founder pricing for life. 6 spots remaining.
We're opening a closed alpha cohort for the first 8 fund customers. Hands-on onboarding, product roadmap co-construction, and founder pricing (-50%) maintained for life.
6 spots remaining · closing August 2026
-
01
Founder pricing (-50%) guaranteed for life on the entire contract
-
02
Hands-on onboarding for all your portcos by our team
-
03
Product roadmap co-construction · monthly partner sync
-
04
Mutual NDA before any fund data exchange
Next step
Book a 30-minute portfolio audit.
We deliver three benchmarked numbers on your portfolio.
01
Estimated cost-per-hire
vs. comparable European fund median. You'll know where you stand.
02
Pooling potential
Number of cross-portco placements your portfolio should be making each year.
03
Carry leakage
Basis points lost to hiring inefficiency over the fund's lifetime.
No commitment. We send the audit deck within 48h, whether you sign or not.